Exploring the depths and potentials of ASP.NET RSS 2.0 or Subscribe to .BenRush by Email
 Tuesday, July 04, 2006

The June CTP of "Atlas" is out; I'd recommend downloading it if you're into that sort of thing.

The biggest change in the release is that you now have the ability to dynamically create and use UpdatePanel controls - this opens up the capability to use them in templated scenarios such as in GridViews, DataGrids, Repeaters, etc. The change the CTP made wasn't to "add" dynamic UpdatePanel controls, but to relax a constraint which pinched when Triggers had to reference the UpdatePanel.

Triggers are the feature of UpdatePanels which allows them to be connected to controls outside their content template region; that is, if the UpdatePanel surrounds a bunch of controls, but wants to also be "notified" when a control outside itself causes a post back, then it must use a Trigger (out of the box there are two types of triggers: those which update a panel when a control raises an event, and those which update a panel when a control's value changes). This is useful if you have a region that surrounds controls that must be asynchronously updated in the browser, but the control that causes the asynchronous update is  off somewhere else on the page (such as a submit button, et al).

When the client "fires" the trigger, the posted data comes back asynchronously and is retrieved/analyzed on the server during the load post data event in the page's lifecycle - which just so happens to occur before the Load, PreRender, etc. events. When the posted data is recieved on the server, the code immediately attempts to link the posted data of the trigger to an UpdatePanel in memory. But - for many controls that support templates - this is too early for an UpdatePanel control which resides within them to have been instantiated. Therefore - no UpdatePanel is found and the post back results in no change on the client....this is the constraint that was changed.

Now, as of the June CTP, you can add UpdatePanel's dynamically to a page - which means they can be inserted at any time and can therefore be a part of the template of GridViews, etc. The most blatant change which powers this new ability occured in the RegisterUpdatePanel public method of the ScriptManager object - a method called by the OnInit method of the UpdatePanel to register itself with the ScriptManager. Whenever the UpdatePanel is instantiated on the page it must register itself with the ScriptManager so that post back events can be filtered to it proxy the ScriptManager (recall that the ScriptManager is basically the king of all controls on the page). What changed in this method is that it now references two variables which are set during the load post data phase of the page lifecycle by the ScriptManager as a "this is what happened during that phase" diary for UpdatePanels that may come about later.

The first of the two new variables referenced in the RegisterUpdatePanel method stores the unique identifier for the UpdatePanel sent to it by the client if that panel isn't found by the time the load post data event occurs. The second is a boolean flag which gets set to True when the load post data phase has completed to prevent duplicate operations on the control (double initializations). Here is the code:

public void RegisterUpdatePanel(UpdatePanel panel)
{
   if (panel == null)
   {
      throw new ArgumentNullException("panel");
   }
   if ((this._allUpdatePanels != null) && this._allUpdatePanels.Contains(panel))
   {
      throw new ArgumentException("This UpdatePanel has already been registered.", "panel");   
   }
   if (this._allUpdatePanels == null)
   {
      this._allUpdatePanels = new List<UpdatePanel>();
   }
   this._allUpdatePanels.Add(panel);
   if ((this._updatePanelRequiresUpdate != null) && (panel.UniqueID == this._updatePanelRequiresUpdate))
   {
      if (panel.Mode == UpdatePanelMode.Conditional)
      {
         panel.Update();
      }   
      this._updatePanelRequiresUpdate = null;
   }
   if (this._panelsInitialized)
   {
      panel.Initialize();
   }
}

When the load post data phase has completed, and the update panel which caused the post back event on the client wasn't found, the _updatePanelRequiresUpdate variable is set to the unique id - in addition the _panelsInitialized boolean is set to true. When an UpdatePanel is instantiated dynamically at a later time, its OnInit method will be called by the page framework (when you add a control to a control collection, one of the operations done to the control is to have its OnInit method called since it wasn't around when the whole page trickled the event down to its child controls). The UpdatePanel's OnInit method calls RegisterUpdatePanel, which now has the unique identifier of the newly instantiated panel control to check against the _updatePanelRequiresUpdate variable. If the identifiers match and this new control's mode is conditional, then the panel is explicitly updated. Regardless, if the Initialize method was called for all early panel's on the page already, then the newly instantiated control has it's Initialize method called thanks to the _panelsInitialized boolean.

As a result...dynamically created UpdatePanels are now possible.


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:14:13 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback
Computing
 Monday, June 26, 2006

Okay - so I lied - one more post before I take a walk.

Check this out: http://msdn.microsoft.com/winfx/.

WinFX, right? No. .Net 3.0. Huh?

Okay - all I'm saying is that I want Indigo back; I actually liked the name Indigo, especially in comparison to the prolix "Windows Communication Foundation". I want Indigo. I also loved the name Avalon. Longhorn? Not so much - I think Vista sounds better. But doesn't Vista, Indigo and Avalon go well together? WinFX was cool to say too. Why are they trashing these cool names and giving them corporate sounding, winded names?

Perhaps I should make a button or web banner that says, "I miss Indigo". I wonder if it's because they believe it'll be more palatable by the corporate nimrods? But - seriously, what does Windows Communication Foundation give us if I'm seeing "WCF" everywhere anyway?

 


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Monday, June 26, 2006 12:48:54 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback
Computing | Ranting

I just got a new book the other day called, "the Pragmatic Programmer" and I'm looking forward to diving into it when I get my article submitted. The fundamental idea behind the book, from what I can tell, is how to make yourself a practical developer of software - yes, that's right: a pragmatic programmer (go figure, eh!?). I believe many developers I encounter are not pragmatic (or pragmatic enough). Why? I believe it's about ego - though I'm not sure. I haven't read a damn bit of the book yet (and may I say *damn* again, because quite frankly I wish I would have more time to do so), but I will be posting thoughts as I read through it.

It's a beautiful night. I think I'm going to take a walk and hit the sack...the voices in my head are speaking in XPath expressions.  


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Monday, June 26, 2006 12:38:25 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback
Computing
 Saturday, June 24, 2006

Okay, completely off topic from what I normally write about; but I had a chance to think today (yes, frightening isn't it?) while driving 60 miles home. As I was entering Lincoln, I noticed a black squirrel and it reminded me of a friend of mine who had one living in his tree a few years back that had a white ring around its tail. It was a very weird looking squirrel. I thought to myself, "Isn't it weird how its genetics not only made it black and white, but also made the pattern rather symmetrical and neatly placed at the end of his tail?" In my usual state of way-too-much-reflection I also realized that I, too, was the product of genetics and, in an odd way, what was going on was genetics appreciating the result of genetics (me appreciating the form of the squirrel).

I took it another step further and realized that, actually, genetics is a product of the laws of nature - and that I was nature appreciating nature - which is true in an odd, contrived fashion. The premise here is that when we look on nature and on the laws of things and notice how fascinating they are because they behave in certain ways, realize that our appreciation may simply be the result of the same thing which makes nature that way.

So, we look outside and appreciate the symmetry of, say, a snowflake; but what IS the the symmetry of the snowflake IS ALSO the producer of our appreciation of that same symmetry. Why is this important? To me this shaves away a bit of the mysiticism in regards to nature - the whole "there must be a creator for these things to happen" is somewhat nullified. The argument becomes somewhat cyclical.


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Saturday, June 24, 2006 3:10:21 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [1] - Trackback
Personal Adventures | Ranting
 Friday, June 23, 2006

I finished the rough draft for the article this afternoon and my compadres are going through it, looking for mistakes et al. I may take a break this weekend from anything related to technical writing - so if you don't see me for a day, that's why :P


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Friday, June 23, 2006 2:16:56 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback
Computing
 Thursday, June 22, 2006

I'm working on another article. I'm hoping to have it done within the week and start looking for people to publish it (I'm aiming for MSDN this time). So - that's where my spare mental CPU cycles have gone....


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:24:57 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [1] - Trackback
Computing
 Friday, June 16, 2006

The conference is over and I'm really, really, really ready to get back home. I'm tired and my brain is full. I'll probably take a couple days to digest some of the information I gathered from the conference and hopefully have some interesting content to put up....see you all in a couple days....

 


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Friday, June 16, 2006 8:34:47 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback
Computing

I went to a fairly good talk this morning on the topic of managed/unmanaged interop issues when programming for VISTA. The core problem is that many of the development tools you'd use to program for this platform won't be ready by the time of release, and so some of the fancy .Net tools and short-cuts we're accustomed to won't be available. As a result, certain situations may require interop to the native APIs of the platform. Cases discussed included:

  1. UAC-aware applications
    1. User Access Control
  2. Windows VISTA desktop search,
    1. Integrated into the client experience in many ways
  3. CommandLinks
    1. The new "button" that's available in Windows VISTA giving allowance for a more descriptive text region.
  4. Common File Dialogs
    1. Presenting the new file dialog interface to clients.

...and so forth. The actual points made, however, wasn't of special interest to me as I believe I could find my way around them if I encountered them, but the fact that I may have to do interop to catch up to certain user interfaces was the most important "point" I took away from the talk.

 


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Friday, June 16, 2006 12:42:19 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [1] - Trackback
Computing

Computers Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Archive
<March 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567
Blogroll
About the author/Disclaimer

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2009
Benjamin Rush
Sign In
Statistics
Total Posts: 444
This Year: 0
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 128
Themes
Pick a theme:
All Content © 2009, Benjamin Rush
DasBlog theme 'Business' created by Christoph De Baene (delarou)