Exploring the depths and potentials of ASP.NET RSS 2.0 or Subscribe to .BenRush by Email
 Monday, January 16, 2006

....I think I might actually start playing with this a bit; it looks like one could, potentially, come up with some interesting utilities.
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Monday, January 16, 2006 2:00:48 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback

 Sunday, January 15, 2006

   http://www.tetris1d.org/tetris.php?PHPSESSID=00c154adf5580845ade4ad67fa69cb74
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:58:06 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback

 Saturday, January 14, 2006

I'm single, I'm young, I'm a geek - give me a break will you ... http://hwpr0n.se/
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Saturday, January 14, 2006 4:27:20 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback

 Friday, January 13, 2006

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2006/0130/076.html
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Friday, January 13, 2006 3:50:15 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback

 Thursday, January 12, 2006

http://news.monstersandcritics.com/health/article_1075525.php/Fluorescent_pigs_developed_in_Taiwan
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:25:30 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback


   Eventually this could be a very cool site.
kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:16:21 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback


I would recommend picking up AJAX in Action.


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:52:56 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback


Okay - well, no, it's not really. For those who do client-side development that requires you to go to the threading level of programming at times, you may have encountered this already, that if you use GetCurrentThreadID in your applications, the compiler will whine now saying that its been obsoleted. Why?

Threads in .Net aren't necessarily threads in the traditional sense of the word (the Win32 sense of the word, that is), just like AppDomains aren't processes in the traditional sense of the word. The reason is because threads, in .Net, can actually be implemented using the old-school construct of fibers. So, it's possible for two seperate threads, then, in the .Net framework to actually have the same real-world threadID (and, GetCurrentThreadID() returns the real-world ThreadID). What was added, then, to the 2.0 frameworks was Thread.ManagedThreadID; which provides a unique identifier for the "thread" the calling code is running on.

...see, I'm writing an application right now which utilizes windows hooks, and I require the actual ID of the calling thread; which Thread.ManagedThreadID does NOT provide.


kick it on DotNetKicks.com
Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:28:15 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [0] - Trackback

Computers Blogs - Blog Top Sites

Archive
<January 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234
Blogroll
About the author/Disclaimer

Disclaimer
The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

© Copyright 2009
Benjamin Rush
Sign In
Statistics
Total Posts: 444
This Year: 0
This Month: 0
This Week: 0
Comments: 128
Themes
Pick a theme:
All Content © 2009, Benjamin Rush
DasBlog theme 'Business' created by Christoph De Baene (delarou)